Showing posts with label Blu-Ray. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blu-Ray. Show all posts

Friday, April 1, 2011

Belle De Jour (1969)

Catherine Denuve in a story of sexual self discovery and coming of age was always going to be a good watch and finally seeing a Luis Brunuel film doesn't hurt either.
I knew very little about the film before hand except that it was much lauded.

I watched Belle De Jour (1969) on Blu-ray via LoveFilm.
My 2011 in Movies will return with Sucker Punch (2011)...


Thursday, January 27, 2011

Jonah Hex (2010)

Jonah Hex - Kevin Kearney
Sometimes you just watch movies to have an opinion on them. 
Like James Cameron movies.
Jonah Hex is one of those. This mean it is likely to be shit but i'm still excited to see it since, i want to have my own opinion and i want to see where it goes wrong and how it does so.



Before i begin that polite hatchet job of Jonah Hex, i'll start with what good with it. It's short- it's 80mins (inc. 6mins of credits...). This blog's 'reason d'etre' will likely be- films are too long but 80mins is 'hell's bells, that's short' short. That's the size of a HBO pilot but with 4x the budget, which admittedly is pretty much on the screen with practical stunts and explosions. Neveldine/Taylor's script is not horrible, it's passable in so much as there are 'zingy' lines and the story's not so ambitious, it could become stodgy. Um, what else... people had work for a few months in 2009?
Anyway, it's basically unmitigatingly crap. But we knew this. We'd heard. The question is why? Where does it fall down? Well everywhere really but mostly the acting. 

From the droney Mastodon score to the paint-by-numbers direction. Jimmy Hayward was a Pixar (no-less) animator who got lucky. Hollywood- please stop letting CGI people direct live-action films, it'll never work. I'll admit it's not as bad as when Mel Gibson let his hairdresser direct Paparazzi but that was an isolated incident. I guarantee that from now on.
(Fun Fact - Jon Peters, Joel Schumacher and Danny De Vito also started as hairdressers.)
I'm not going to address the role of Malkovich in this film. It's not that urgent or important to me, to do so. I could talk shit about his acting but i want to focus on Michael Fassbender.
Let me just compose myself, Michael Fassbender. I'm not upset... I'm just very disappointed.
So much potential gone to waste Mike... 

You were like 5 wins and undefeated in your short career. From Inglorious Basterds to Fishtank to Hunger. 
Hunger-what a sumptuous cinematic debut. And then this... Playing irish henchman #1. If that wasn't so abhorrent, you really 'mick' it up to eleven. You're a proud Irishman FFS. It was so bad, i thought you were going to ask Jonah Hex if he wanted his drive tarmac'ed. I expect it of him, he says thumbing at Malkovich. But not you Fassbender. Not you.
Apparently other-modern-acting-great Michael Shannon was in this, but I don't remember seeing him sooo... congrats to him. That's the cinematic equivalent of having gym-note from your mother.
Not going to lay into Megan Fox cos well, Megan Foxs are meant to be seen and not heard but Josh Brolin has the capacity to be great- very good in W. and No Country.., generally solid actor. Here- phoning it in... just faxing it in.
I get overarching feeling all the actors knew this was a piece of shit, the producers set-out to make 5-showing-a-day-for- 2weeks programmer. That this was made for the short-term, not as art made to last the test of time.
It's already failed last year.


I watched Jonah Hex (2010) on Blu-Ray via LoveFilm.
My 2011 in Movies will return with Blow Out (1981)...

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Valhalla Rising (2009)

I wanted to watch Valhalla Rising, mainly because of the director Nicolas Winding Refn.
He made this great film about Charles Bronson, the UK's infamous career prisoner. It's strange but in tackling a real person's life on film, he made this very intangible world. I mean Charles Bronson, isn't someone with the greatest grip on reality and that's part of what it was but you felt while watching, the action would move like slow, slow motion then-BANG! something inexorable would happen and change atmosphere in the film. I really have no interest in Vikings or Celtish historical exercises but if Refn can do what he did to the Biopic- i'm curious to see what he'll do with this.


Before i start, i have to say this film would have been awesome if it had Peter Mullan in it because he has such a past of methodical Scottish aggressors.
Anyway, that thing said about the 'slow moving action then-BANG!' - that's totally what happening here as well. It's never boring but based on the poster art or the name or your preconceptions about Celts or maybe you thought, it might be like a pound-shop Braveheart or Spartacus but it's really not quite... methodical, more... ethereal than you might think. It kinda make me think, 'if this had a British Metal soundtrack like Maiden, definately Venom, it wouldn't be a too much of a stretch.' - in the way, that would be kinda reminiscent of the Robert Plant fantasy sequences of Led Zeppelin's The Song Remains The Same- (FFWD to 4mins in)


But really i'm thinking something closer to this (musically) ...

No, while watching Valhalla Rising, you get the feeling it's just about the pick-up momentum, it's just about to become this sudden-cut'n'slash fast-paced dealy but after the first hour, you realise that's not coming but that's not a bad thing, every 10mins there's a bit of the ol' sudden ultraviolence.
Mads Mikkelsen plays Det. Sgt. John Valhalla-(LOOLZ)- No, he's plays the laconic 'One-Eye', so called because presumably because someone superglued someone's 'ballskin' across his one eye.
'Testes?' He sure is!! He starts off as his bare-knuckle boxer of sorts for his Celtish gangster masters and we see early on, he's capable of an animalistic sorta killing ability, literally ripping assailants apart.
And after he escapes his masters (Guess how?...), he then gets with some Christians who are off on a... voyage?
That pretty much what's going on here. If a plot or story are important to you, this won't be for you but i'm of the opinion, plots and story hold back some films.
I liked this film, cos you can tell they spent like £60 to make it on the side of the Scottish Highlands and it's grimy, rough'n'readyness, lends to a great charm for it. 
It's kinda superfluous to mention DVD extras but it wasn't until i watched the making-of, I realised that SPOILER the end of this film, takes place in America!!! meaning they took a viking-style long-ship there from Scotlandwhich is a weird fantasy turn but i'm not mad at it.
It's interesting because Valhalla Rising and this year's much lauded, Monsters were both made by Vertigo Films. Both rely on beautiful picturesque vistas, (largely) unknown actors, digital-style filming- but i didn't like Monsters at all. The difference I think was Valhalla Rising has a cognizant monster throughout- Monsters threatens monsters only to disappoint at the end.


I watched Valhalla Rising (2009) on Blu-Ray via LoveFilm.
My 2011 in Movies will return with Twinky (1970) - (OMGZZZ - I found this film last night, and it got bumped up to the top of the list...)